Are you an “Antivaxxer”?
If you have ever been accused of being an “antivaxxer”, this article may arm you with information showing your cautions about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines are not altogether crazy.
Opposing Narratives.
The “safe and effective” narratives about mRNA products were promoted by specific stakeholders who were deeply invested in their success.
The “deniers” of those products have been people harmed by them or who, like me, were skeptical of the narratives for a variety of good reasons.
For example, I knew:
Clinical trial testing was grossly flawed and inadequate;
EUA status for pharma products had never been previously granted for use on healthy populations.
Liability protection was granted to the drug manufacturers as a “condition of sale” to governments to use for mass “vaccination” (an odd requirement for a “safe and effective” product).
Many other accommodations were made in an unprecedented rush to market of products based on new, experimental technology.
One of my favourites.
A Midwestern Doctor publishes regular Substack articles under “The Forgotten Side of Medicine”. This linked post is an excellent read for anyone who is interested in the history of vaccines and their associated risks.
Like most of my readers who pride themselves in being critical thinkers, the information provided by this doctor is the kind of material that should be routinely provided to every vaccine recipient. In this way, genuine “informed consent” could be achieved in good conscience by our medical professionals.
Five out of six times, Russian roulette is harmless. But that does not mean that it is safe.
This analogy pretty well sums up my feelings on the mRNA shots, where the word "safe" was clearly impossible to validate, given the novelty and lack of long term testing of the Covid jabs.
Perhaps that has been true of many other medical treatments whose safety we have taken for granted over the years?
Yes I am against poisoning people!