DIGITAL DIRECT DEMOCRACY A Libertarian Antidote to Digital Communism
In early 2023, I published this “citizen white paper” on Amazon as an ebook. In only 36 Kindle pages, I proposed a system to enable citizens to OPT OUT of certain taxes and government programs.
One year Anniversary: A Review
This ebook begins with a description of Digital Communism as practiced in China.
Globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum are advancing a New World Order - a worldwide political, social and economic model of governance similar to China’s.
What is the NEW WORLD ORDER?
Phrases like “The Great Reset”, “build back better”, "stakeholder capitalism" and “you will own nothing and be happy” have been heard and seen often in recent years. They are associated with the New World Order promoted by some of the world’s richest and most powerful men and women often referred to as the “global elites”. The World Economic Forum is the face of this global movement, supported by the United Nations.
Like all successful propaganda, the frequent repetition of those phrases were intended to become embedded in the psyches of the citizens of the world to mentally and emotionally prepare them for the planned changes that are steadily coming in waves.
Bend It Like Beckham in 2003
The film Bend It Like Beckham had an impact on Western culture as many films do. Memes arising from its themes of morality and social acceptability still pop up from time to time revealing the ability that the widespread and frequent exposure to certain ideas can leave indelible imprints in the minds of many.
Those memes were an early forshading of the pervasive DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion) social policies found today in the Human Resources employee handbooks of every government institution, especially schools, and many corporations today.
Chinese citizens experienced a more severe form of social conditioning. Apparently, most citizens of China have been culturally conditioned to readily accepted many restrictions to their freedoms ever since the rule of Chairman Mao and his rollout of communism.
The modern rollout of digital surveillance technologies enables today's Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to more effectively manage and control the individual choices of its citizens who tacitly accept this as just the next inevitable step in communism’s evolution.
Is this what’s coming to the west?
What I believed a year ago was naiive.
Active in “freedom groups” since early covid, I believed that public discussion was essential to reverse the slide into what I called “Digital Communism”. I now wonder if public discussion if enough.
The forces that we must oppose to stop this slide are powerful beyond the imagination of the average concerned citizen. Rallies, protests and speeches all help to build public awareness, but the ‘HOW’ is still uncharted territory.
CPD: Fighting Fire With Fire
Described in Digital Direct Democracy (DDD) is a Citizens’ Preferences Directory (CPD). A year ago, I had hoped that it would catch on in public discussion to show that there is a creative way to defend and protect Democracy with digital technology and direct citizen participation that it enabled.
Citizens’ Preferences Directory would employ modern digital web, communication and database technologies to breach the wall of Digital Communsism that is being build around us.
DDD will enable every Canadian of voting age to exercise his or her Freedom of Informed Choice concerning certain taxes and government programs. Think of it as an online subscription service that will allow citizens to pay a carbon tax, for example, if they believe that the Climate Change Crisis Theory (CCCT) to be a significant threat to humanity, or OPT OUT of paying that tax if they reject CCCT.
Traditional DEMOCRACY is OBSOLETE
Traditional Democracy has been described as a legalized form of “mob rule”. Its “one-size-fits-all” policies were considered “fair” to everyone because “the majority” had voted for them and they would be administered “equally”over every citizen.
With declining voter turnout since the 1970s, very few elected representatives ever exceed 51% of votes from all eligible electors - a “majority” by any definition.
Unfortunately, some citizens are considered “more equal than others” in the arena of power politics. Votes are the only political “currency” that matters in this realm and votes are subject to bribery and dubious election promises. In fact, it has become evident to many Canadians that today’s so-called “democracy” is no more than “political theatre” designed to make citizens THINK that they have a voice in how they are governed and by whom.
Anyone who has spent time understanding how governments operate, and with whom they “partner” to fulfill their power agenda, will know just how feeble is the average citizens voice. It's time to magnify their voice!
The CPD proposal is both VIABLE and TIMELY
I worked as an IT Recruiter for 36 years and have interviewed over 10,000 IT professionals. From this experience, I learned a great deal about a large variety of IT jobs and systems.
My largest corporate client designed, developed, implemented, maintained, enhanced over time and supported networks of their customers that relied heavily on a very similar type of system that I am proposing for the Citizens’ Preferences Directory (CPD).
Given that I placed over 40 IT professionals with that client nearly 20 years ago, I know that the technology and systems architecture options that exist today for the CPD are much superior to what was used then.
With 100% certainty, I know that the CPD solution can be created. As the first of its kind, the CPD will bring the unprecedented benefits of Direct Democracy to every citizen.
It will also showcase what’s possible in the Digital Age to empower the voice of citizens in all democracies globally.
I plan to include excepts from DDD in the months ahead. After all, if repetition worked for the Chinese, maybe it will work for me to inject the CPD concept into the public psyche.
Gene, Trudeau has taken a page from the WEF agenda. He uses MSM as his tool for continuous message repetition. He also believes in changing democracy. Problem is he wants a dictatorship with him at the top !