Gather 2030 on Global Warming
My friend, Maggie Braun, posted an excellent essay on the Climate Change Crisis Theory in rebuttal to the claims made by is many of its advocates. She included a list of scientific references.
Maggie’s title:
Reevaluating the Anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming Hypothesis: A Critical Analysis of Natural Climate Drivers and Absorption Mechanisms
https://substack.com/@maggiehopebraun/note/p-159874950?r=p1m7l&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Municipal governments publish documents on Climate Change too.
The image below is the cover page for a 31 page document published by a municipal government. From my experience, the publication usually contain nothing more than unsubstantiated claims meaning that they DO NOT include a list of scientific evidence. If they refer to any sources at all, they are usually a World Government entity like the United Nations, or the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, of a pan-government agreement like the Paris Climate Accord orchestrated by the UN.
Cover page of the PDF document linked below
https://www.haliburtoncounty.ca/en/planning-and-maps/resources/Documents/Corporate-Climate-Change-Adaptation-Plan-Accessible.pdf
Read Page 01, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.
You will find a page full of claims and not a single scientific reference.
If a single citizen like Maggie Braun can write a Substack post about Global Warming and back it with scientific references, why can’t an entire municipal government treat its constituents with at least the same degree of respect?
Read Page 05, CLIMATE CHANGES CAUSES AND IMPACTS
You will find a page full of claims which attribute problems alleged to be caused by greenhouse gases like CO2, but no scientific proof. As Ronald Reagan advised: “Trust, but verify”, it’s hard to trust a public document that does not provide references to back claims made so that citizens can readily verify the claims.
Public Propaganda.
In the Age of Google and AI tools like GROK-3, there is no excuse for public officials to publish any documents with claims they omit to verify. Without access to proper verification, documents like this cannot be classified as anything more than public propaganda.