Justice for you & “Justice” for them.

Dr. Anthony Fauci is the best-known face of thousands of public health officials, and complicit politicians, who led pandemic mandates which likely harmed more US and CDN people than the virus.

Headlines tell the Story.

I subscribe to The Epoch Times even though I remain suspicious of virtually all media sources these days. However, it rates higher on my personal trust index than “the commie rag” (aka The Toronto Star) or any its ilk.

Following my reading of the two links below, one question came to mind…

After 2-year Legal Fight, CDC Releases 780,000 Vaccine Injury Reports From V-safe System | Facts Matter

https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/epochtv/after-2-year-legal-fight-cdc-releases-780k-vaccine-injury-reports-from-v-safe-system-facts-matter-exclusive-5626589?utm_medium=app&c=share_pos1&pid=iOS_app_share&utm_source=iOS_app_share

House Panel Subpoenas Top Fauci Adviser to Appear and Answer COVID Questions

https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/us/house-panel-subpoenas-top-fauci-adviser-to-appear-and-answer-covid-questions-5646344?utm_medium=app&c=share_pos1&pid=iOS_app_share&utm_source=iOS_app_share

… when will they go to jail?

It’s easy to single out one person, like Dr. Anthony Fauci, for the crimes of the many public officials and mass media propagandists. The Covid jab mandates foist upon millions of innocent, trusting citizens was akin to play Russian roulette with their lives, health and livelihoods.

Another article by an Epoch Times journalist reported that US Marshals arrested ~75,000 criminals during 2024 for a wide category of crimes. One category that was missing was the one that identified the people who were responsible for the 780,000 reported vaccine injuries, and the number of them who were arrested and jailed for crimes.

I feel sorry for every government employee, member of the armed forces, corporate employee, and many more, who were mandated to “roll the dice”. God-knows-how-many people accept “the jab” under the threat of losing their job or professional licence. And how many did so with a full understanding of the jab’s risks?

I am not sure if the coercive circumstances under which untold numbers of citizens were forced to submit to the mandates could be classified as blackmail or extortion, but if it smells rotten, it likely is rotten!

I asked BING Copilot to explain how the Canadian constitution should have protected every citizen’s right to choose or reject the jab.

INFORMED CONSENT…

The principle of "informed consent" is not explicitly mentioned in the Canadian Constitution. However, it is protected through various laws and regulations that align with constitutional principles, particularly those related to individual rights and freedoms.

1. **Privacy Laws**: Informed consent is a key element in Canadian privacy legislation, such as the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). These laws require organizations to obtain meaningful consent from individuals before collecting, using, or disclosing their personal information².

2. **Healthcare**: Informed consent is a fundamental principle in Canadian healthcare. Patients have the right to receive all relevant information about their medical treatment options and to make informed decisions about their care. This principle is supported by provincial health laws and professional guidelines.

3. **Indigenous Rights**: The concept of free, prior, and informed consent is recognized in the context of Indigenous rights. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which Canada has endorsed, emphasizes the need for informed consent from Indigenous communities before undertaking actions that affect their lands, territories, and resources³.

4. **Legal Protections**: The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, part of the Constitution Act, 1982, provides broad protections for individual rights and freedoms, which underpin the principle of informed consent. For example, the right to security of the person (Section 7) can be interpreted to include the right to make informed decisions about one's own body and personal information.

These frameworks collectively ensure that the principle of informed consent is respected and upheld in various aspects of Canadian life.

Source: Conversation with Copilot, 2025-01-04

(1) Guidelines for obtaining meaningful consent - Office of the Privacy .... https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/privacy-topics/collecting-personal-information/consent/gl_omc_201805/.

(2) Indigenous Consultation and Consent in Canadian Law. https://www.theindigenousfoundation.org/articles/consultation-and-consent-in-canadian-law.

(3) Principles respecting the Government of Canada's relationship with .... https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/principles-principes.html.

Americans have similar rights.

While Dr. Fauci is American and his colleagues within the CDC, HHS, NAIAD, FDA are too, their Canadian counterparts also followed America’s pandemic response led by those institutions. We were all led like lemmings in a collective trance under the America’s misguided (corrupt?) leadership.

A case in point

The V-Safe system managed by the CDC was an active monitoring facility which enabled younger Americans to report post-jab symptoms from an app on their phone through the pandemic until June 30, 2023.

The CDC only released about 10% of the data AFTER a court judge commanded it (more is coming later).

In other words, CDC officials had damaging, real-time information about the mRNA shots throughout the entire pandemic and they hid it from the public!

Unacceptable Double Standards.

If you, an average Canadian, were facing a lawsuit and you had to undergo the stressful grilling of a legal deposition by a very skilled and aggressive lawyer to uncover (under oath) everything you know about the legal incident at hand, you would be charged with “contempt of court” or ‘perjury’ if you were found to withhold evidence. Your punishment would fit the severity of the crime.

On the other hand, public officials and vaccine manufacturers have full liability protection regardless of the harms and omissions of evidence that occur under their authority. What’s their punishment?

PROBLEM:

Do American and Canadian jails and prisons have enough empty cells to accommodate every politician, public officials and liability-protected organization if they were found guilty of withholding V-safe (and other sources of data) information?

Is there no way to punish them for not taking immediate action to warn citizens that the “safe and effective” experimental mRNA technology was not as “safe and effective” as advertised?

How much blood?

How much blood would be found on the hands of the people who withheld crucial information from the public?

How much blood must be spilled before the safety of citizens take priority over the power and profit interests of the likely suspects?

How much of their blood will American and Canadian civilians allow to be spilled before they will say: “Enough is enough!”.

When will a critical mass of citizens finally engage in the levels of critical thinking, healthy skepticism and the collective action needed to reform the many institutions which we no longer trust and that we cannot reasonably expect to hold accountable for their harmful actions?

Remember when you heard this advice?

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been one of the prominent voices stating that ivermectin is primarily a horse dewormer and not suitable for treating COVID-19 in humans.

In August 2021, the FDA tweeted, “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”

This tweet was reported widely and repeatedly on complicit mainstream media channels and news outlets. It as intended to drive home the propaganda that ivermectin (IVM) should not be used for COVID-19 treatment. It was never explained to the public, however, that the experimental mRNA treatments would never have received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the FDA if other treatments were available (like IVM).

The enormous profits of the drug and insurance companies, and their clandestine partners in crime, would never have been earned.

Much too much dirty money was at stake. Human lives were expendable.

This podcast conversation with Tucker Carlson explains it far better than I can.

With ‘awake’ replace ‘woke’ in 2025?

Today, there are still too many Canadians and Americans who are not yet awake to the dangers of blindly following unverified information promoted by public sources.

It is my 2025 hope that every one of them will hear this good advice from you:

We are not lemmings so let’s stop acting like them.