Planned Climate Change Deposition

I plan to schedule my next deposition to City Council in order to register my objections to the apparent willingness of City Council member to promote a Climate Crisis agenda.

I object to…

The apparent belief by some Councillors that Climate Change is a significant threat which automatically commands government action, legislation and/or spending.

Any vote by a Councillor who is willing to jeopardize our Energy Security whenever those magic words “Climate Change” are invoked.

Example: On August 29, two Kawartha Lakes Environmental Advisory Committee representatives made a deputation that asked Council to oppose the Expansion of Gas Plants in Ontario for reasons of Climate Change. (Report PLAN2023-04). I hope Council has rejected that request.

The purpose of this deputation:

To satisfy the constituents of the City of Kawartha Lakes that this Council possesses the scientific knowledge and critical thinking abilities to competently make decisions on their behalf regarding the hypothesis that ‘Climate Change is a significant threat requiring a government response’ ( henceforth to be referred to as “the CC Theory”). This is a question of Public Confidence in our elected representatives.

A test of competence

To test your scientific knowledge and commitment to put your constituents first, please answer the following 3 Questions relating to the CC Theory. Be sure to include relevant citations from published scientific papers (NOTE: only submissions from recognized scientific journals will be accepted) which describe the Mechanism of Action at the molecular level and provide the data collected by the researchers.

QUESTION #1

According to https://pulsegrow.com/blogs/learn/co2 ‘The Ultimate CO2 Guide for Indoor Growing’, the optimal level of atmospheric CO2 for plant growth within a greenhouse ranges from 600 to 1500 PPM. These levels are magnitudes higher than outdoor CO2 levels of ~415 PPM.

Please explain how and why greenhouses do not burst into flames when CO2 levels exceed 600 PPM?

QUESTION #2

Antonio Guterres, Secretary-General of the UN, recently made this public announcement:  “… we have entered the era of global boiling”.

Please explain why a pot of water doesn’t begin to boil inside a greenhouse when CO2 levels of 1500 PPM are reached?

Why should anyone trust the United Nations, the IPCC, or any other globalist body when they make such outrageous statements like this “global boiling” claim? 

QUESTION #3

Energy Security means reliable and affordable energy for everyone.

Green Energy sources cannot replace energy supplied from fossil fuels to meet our Energy Security needs. Politically, affordable and reliable energy affects everyone,  yet only a small proportion of constituents believe the CC Theory.

Will Council commit to prioritize our Energy Security above all else whenever a proposal based on the CC Theory is presented to it?

I propose that Council:

1. DECLARE Energy Security as the top priority over any proposals based on the CC Theory.

2. REQUIRE the highest possible standards of proof when topics involving the CC Theory arise? In other words, REJECT “climate change” as a magic phrase that must automatically command your serious attention and consideration. EXPECT to receive verifiable and specifically-related scientific proof to validate the CC Theory before any related proposal is granted consideration by Council.

3. SPEND NO ADDITIONAL time, money or resources on any future submissions to Council that allege public concerns based on the CC Theory, such as Report PLAN2023-04.

4. REPRESENT 100% of CKL constituents, not just the minority who believe the CC Theory.

5. PROVIDE Council’s answers to the above 3 Questions on the City’s website to demonstrate your understanding of the science relating to the CC Theory.

===========================================================================

For interested readers, Science and Economics are intricately entwined especially where Climate Change intersects with public institutions and their imposed controls on everyone.

ECONOMICS is the study of people engaged in trade.

People act as producers and consumers.

In voluntary trade, people act to exchange the use of their person (body, mind and efforts) to produce goods and/or services for acceptable compensation (money or equivalents.)

People employed in Governments act to referee trade between people, and receive coerced compensation for these non-negotiable services. 

With the above description of Economics, the degree that taxation and legislation from the Climate Change Governmental Complex has affected every Canadian life for decades past is beyond “excessive”, and will have much more in the decades to come - UNLESS WE STOP IT!

Read my book for more on this topic.