Poison as medicine.
I am not generally in the habit of quoting Friedrich Nietzsche but this is one time it seems appropriate.
Context is important.
What does not kill me makes me stronger is part of aphorism number 8 from the "Maxims and Arrows" section of Friedrich Nietzsche's Twilight of the Idols (1888). Whether it proves to be true or false depends entirely on the context in which it is used.
According to this recent research, the authors claim it to be false. They provides circumstances which validly support their assertions.
Homeopathy professionals would disagree.
Homeopathic practitioners prescribe treatments based on their knowledge that if you introduce an antigen to the human body in the right dose, it will illicit an immune response that will defeat the antigen and leave behind a store of the newly-created antibodies that will be ready to pounce should the antigen return at some future date.
The key to success is dosing at a level that will trigger an appropriate immune response without poisoning the host.
Viruses have been common sources of disease throughout history. They come in many variations and, until recently, they were all creations of nature. Millions have died from natural viral infections. Medical researchers and practitioners have experimented endlessly to find what works to defeat their assaults on health. Today’s huge pharmaceutical and medical products sector stands in proof of that effort over centuries.
The human body is home to many pathogens.
Billions of viruses and bacteria coexist with billions of healthy, life-giving cells in every human body. Our understanding of this symbiosis is not well understood but we do understand that the human immune system has evolved to protect us from their assaults on our health. Since our knowledge of this dynamic continues to be a “work in progress”, errors in judgement occur and sometimes medical treatments go wrong.
The SARS Cov-2 virus was a human creation produced in a lab in China. That accomplishment represents the culmination of scientific research that had gone on for decades. The furin cleavage in the genetic sequence of the SARS Cov-2 viron is proof that it was man-made. Likewise, the Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J treatments for the Covid-19 infection were also man-made and were allegedly intended to safely treat and prevent an infection.
The “vaccine” products were designed using a similar theory as that employed in homeopathy.
The spike protein was that antigen which was expected to illicit an immune response that was strong enough to create enduring antibodies but not so strong as to kill the host.
The theory was sound, but the implementation had revealed that there was no guarantee that the agents designed to achieve this immune response would be safe or effective.
Long Covid is an illness.
Many different disease symptoms manifest in some people within days and weeks of a Covid-19 infection or a jab. Known as Long Covid, the illness can remain sub-clinical for longer periods until some future date when a health challenge arises.
Apparently, the spike protein generated by the jab is not identical to that produced by a SARS Cov-2 infection. The synthetic version is “industrial strength” and designed to remain in the body longer than the natural version.
The lipid nano particle technology, which was created to encase the mRNA payload to enable it of be loaded into healthy human cells, is also a known pathogen.
A recent study was published in Germany that showed that spike protein is still found in human tissues two years after introduction by jab or natural infection. If so, then when does the human immune system stop “working overtime” to rid the body of these pathogens?
Infections are a feature of the immune system at work. When myocarditis or endocarditis is the diagnosis, the “-itis” signifies that the immune system is steadily at work to clear unwanted antigens from infecting otherwise healthy tissues associated with the heart.
Is Long Covid an iatrogenic disease?
Iatrogenesis normally applies to undesired and harmful medical outcomes which result from treatments prescribed by a single physician.
The authorized use of the Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J products was approved and facilitated by millions of people in positions of authority up and down the institutional hierarchies within those responsible.
Is “iatrogenesis” the right term to designate the attribution of widespread harm in this case?
Perhaps the term “politico-genesis” should be added to take in the full scope of culpability for those institutional actors who were instrumental in inflicting harm and aggression on much of humanity from their errors in judgement and action.
Nietzsche did not foresee Covid-19.
The phrase, “that which does not kill me makes me stronger” may have been true some of the time relating to the governments’ responses to the pandemic, including the mandated jabs. However, it is certainly false for those who were unfortunate enough to die or become incapacitated from the pandemic policies and products.
They were all man-made, from the virus, to the “vaccine”, to the lockdown measures, to the policy enforcement actions of the police, courts and corporate policy-makers, and others. “Polito-genic” combined with “iatrogenic” seems to fit, and they combine well to describe our times.
Those who suffered the consequences of the man-made virus and its alleged antidotes have been intentionally silenced by the guilty authories who have too much power and not nearly enough integrity or a functioning conscience.
Fortunately, the National Citizens Inquiry offers over 300 testimonies of Canadians who tell their personal and professional stories about the massive politico-genic consequences they and others experienced since early 2020.
Listen in. You won’t be sorry. Start with viewing the video link of Dr. Jordan Peterson who provided a succinct, 7 minute overview of the past 3 years.
Parliaments and congresses in most western democracies have held hearings on various aspects of the pandemic, including the "vaccines". Questions have been raised about the origins of the virus, the safety of the mRNA injections, and the effectiveness of lockdowns and other policies.
Canada's parliament and media has been obsessed with the homeless crisis, rising inflation and interest rates, the war in Ukraine, gender ideology, climate change etc. Other distractions like the recent cabinet shuffle and the Prime Minister's marriage have also captured the public's attention.
Aside from the Emergencies Act inquiry, it appears that there is no committee studying or questioning any of the issues raised since early 2020 as far as I am aware. As well, there has been complete radio silence regarding the NCI and its findings.
"What does not kill me makes me stronger." This statement does not apply if "what" DOES kill you. The only way this statement can be declared false is if "what" does not kill you and does NOT make you stronger. I'm sure lots if things qualify as such, and some even make you weaker.