Government powers have expanded in many ways over the years. Some involved decisions for well-intented purposes, but the unintended consequences were hard to predict. It’s best to repeal them.
Early in the discussion, Professor Gutzman stated that over 400 government agencies now exist with authorities that were never intended or expected when the “Chevron defense” was enacted. Today, in 2024, no official list of those agencies and their official domains of authority exists.
Its no wonder that the ‘administrative state’ continues to growth uimpeded and with virtually no accountability to the public.
What about in Canada?
Is there an equivant of the “Chevron defense” in Canada? It appears so!
What else explains why Ontario Premier Doug Ford stepped aside during covid to allow unelected Public Health officials to make all decisions regarding pandemic policies? Premier Ford all but disappeared from public view while various assigned health and medical authorities took centre stage.
Dr. Teresa Tam played to similar role federally while Justin Trudeau postured and feigned a competence that everyone knew was fake.
A summary from Bing Copilot
The “Chevron defense”, it’s significance and the controversy around it.
The “Chevron defense” is a legal principle established by the U.S. Supreme Court in the 1984 case “Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.” This doctrine dictates that courts should defer to federal agencies' interpretations of ambiguous statutes that the agencies are responsible for administering, as long as the interpretation is reasonable¹².
Significance:
1. Empowers Federal Agencies: It grants agencies the authority to interpret and implement laws, allowing them to fill in gaps and address ambiguities in legislation. This is crucial for the effective administration of complex and technical regulatory schemes¹².
2. Consistency and Expertise: Agencies often have specialized expertise and are better equipped than courts to make informed decisions on technical matters. Chevron defence ensures that these expert interpretations are given weight².
3. Judicial Efficiency: By deferring to agencies, courts can avoid becoming bogged down in the minutiae of regulatory details, focusing instead on broader legal principles¹.
4. Stability in Regulation: It provides a stable framework for regulatory agencies to operate within, which can lead to more predictable and consistent regulatory environments².
However, the Chevron defence has been controversial, with critics arguing that it gives too much power to unelected bureaucrats and undermines the judiciary's role in interpreting the law¹². Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court has been reconsidering this doctrine, which could significantly impact the future of administrative law¹.
Source: Conversation with Copilot, 2024-07-07
(1) What is the Chevron defence and why has it been overruled? - BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c51ywwrq45qo.
(3) What is the Chevron defence and why has it been overruled? - BBC. https://bing.com/search?q=Chevron+defence+significance.
(4) The Significance of Chevron Defence - NRDC. https://www.nrdc.org/bio/david-doniger/significance-chevron-defence.
(5) The Significance of Chevron Defence - CleanTechnica. https://cleantechnica.com/2024/01/13/the-significance-of-chevron-defence/.
(6) Kavanaugh And The “Chevron Doctrine” - Stanford Law School. https://law.stanford.edu/2018/08/02/kavanaugh-and-the-chevron-doctrine/.
There are several arguments against Chevron defence.
Critics believe it grants too much power to federal agencies. Here are some key points:
1. Separation of Powers. Critics argue that Chevron defence undermines the separation of powers by allowing executive agencies to both interpret and enforce laws, roles traditionally reserved for the judiciary¹². This concentration of power in the executive branch is seen as a threat to the checks and balances system.
2. Judicial Abdication: Some believe that Chevron defence leads to judicial abdication, where courts fail to fulfill their duty to interpret the law independently³. Instead, they defer to agencies' interpretations, which may not always align with legislative intent.
3. Lack of Accountability: Agencies are not elected bodies, and critics argue that Chevron defence gives unelected officials too much influence over significant policy decisions². This can lead to a democratic deficit, where important regulatory decisions are made without direct accountability to the public.
4. Inconsistency and Unpredictability: Opponents claim that Chevron defence can result in inconsistent and unpredictable interpretations of laws, as different agencies might interpret the same statute in varying ways². This can create confusion and instability for regulated entities.
5. Risk to Individual Liberty: By concentrating power in administrative agencies, Chevron deference is seen as a risk to individual liberty. Critics argue that it allows agencies to create, interpret, and enforce regulations with minimal oversight, potentially infringing on personal freedoms⁵.
These arguments have gained traction in recent years, leading to significant legal debates and even a Supreme Court decision in 2024 that curtailed the power of federal agencies by overturning the Chevron doctrine¹².
Source: Conversation with Copilot, 2024-07-07
(1) Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal .... https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-chevron-curtailing-power-of-federal-agencies/.
(2) Supreme Court Chevron decision: What it means for federal regulations .... https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-chevron-regulations-environment-4ae73d5a79cabadff4da8f7e16669929.
(3) Argument analysis: Hating on Chevron - SCOTUSblog. https://www.scotusblog.com/2018/11/argument-analysis-hating-on-chevron/.
(4) Arguments against judicial defense: Defense is ... - Ballotpedia. https://ballotpedia.org/Arguments_against_judicial_defense:_Defense_is_unconstitutional.
(5) Chevron and Stare Decisis - The George Mason Law Review. https://lawreview.gmu.edu/print__issues/chevron-and-stare-decisis/.
A landmark decision on June 28, 2024.
Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court significantly limited Chevron defense. The case, “Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo”, involved challenges to a rule issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service⁴⁵.
Key Points of the Decision:
1. Overruling Chevron: The Court explicitly overruled the Chevron defense doctrine which had been in place since 1984. This doctrine required courts to defer to federal agencies' interpretations of ambiguous statutes as long as the interpretation was reasonable⁴⁵.
2. Judicial Independence: The ruling emphasized that courts must exercise their independent judgment in interpreting laws, rather than deferring to agencies simply because a statute is ambiguous⁴⁵.
3. Impact on Federal Agencies: This decision curtails the power of federal agencies to interpret and implement laws without judicial oversight, potentially leading to more judicial scrutiny of agency actions⁴⁵.
Implications:
- Increased Judicial Role: Courts will now play a more active role in interpreting statutes, which could lead to more legal challenges and a shift in how regulations are enforced.
- Regulatory Uncertainty: The decision may create uncertainty in regulatory environments as agencies adjust to the new legal landscape and courts take on a greater role in statutory interpretation⁴⁵.
This ruling marks a significant shift in administrative law and could have wide-ranging effects on various sectors, from environmental regulation to healthcare.
Source: Conversation with Copilot, 2024-07-07
(1) Supreme Court strikes down Chevron, curtailing power of federal .... https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-chevron-curtailing-power-of-federal-agencies/.
(2) SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-451_7m58.pdf.
(3) Why the Supreme Court's decision overruling Chevron and limiting federal agencies is so significant. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/why-the-supreme-courts-decision-limiting-federal-agencies-is-so-significant/ar-BB1p5npf.
(5) The Potential Upside of the Supreme Court’s Chevron Decision. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/the-potential-upside-of-the-supreme-court-s-chevron-decision/ar-BB1pstba.
(6) Supreme Court Overrules Chevron Defense Doctrine - National Law Review. https://www.natlawreview.com/article/supreme-court-overrules-chevron-far-reaching-decision-limiting-power-administrative.
— MOST C A R E F U L L Y
— THOUGHTFULLY, MOST— PRAYERFULLY ‼️‼️‼️