The EXCESS DEATHS Controversy Continues
Many independent scientists and investigators continue to ask how “safe and effective” the Covid genetic treatments have actually been. The term “vaccine” has been dropped for obvious reasons.
Forensic Evidence
I met a 16 year old girl yesterday at the Lindsay Bulk Barn check out counter. I asked her about her future career aspirations and she plans to attend college for training as a forensic investigator. This got me thinking about who employs those specialists.
Law enforcement and criminal investigation came to mind first, then insurance companies. However, the following soon dawned on me.
In this age of the Digital Economy, Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence, it is now clear to me that thousands of specialists like Dr. Pierre Kory and John Beaudoin are performing forensic investigations. They expertly use their skills, tools and knowledge to uncover malfeasance by government bodies and unscrupulous corporations. Kory investigates those who promoted experimental genetic treatments intended for everyone on the planet regardless of each individual’s susceptibility to a viral pathogen.
The forensic chart above displays clearly a period of excess unexplained death during the time when billions of jabs of experimental drugs were administered with laughable “informed consent” by recipients.
The chart shows that the excess death counts began to drop to pre-jab levels AFTER the “boosters” were promoted to an increasingly suspicious public who refused them. This is good news for anyone who had accepted the first two shots because it shows that the danger of a fatal outcome from a jab-induced “adverse reaction” passes with time.
A “free market” of forensic analysis.
Dr. Pierre Kory is just one of many experts who perform and distribute “forensic analyses” to online subscribers like me who share his passion for answers to suspicious human behaviours. Dr. Kory, like so many others, offers this expertise on Substack for free while accepting donations from readers who value his services.
As we walked to the car, my wife commented on my thoughts about the young girl’s career aspirations and marvelled at how by brain works to predict the future implications of her career choice. After 36 years and 10,000+ interviews between 1981 and 2018 when I was employed as an IT Recruitment Specialist, is comes naturally for me to speculate on such things.
I see a comparable level of insight in your analysis as is shown by that young lady’s career aspirations. A successful life requires a strong built in BS detector. I do however wonder if today’s education system can still teach objective thinking.
Pertaining to your Pierre Kory example, yes we live in a time when such analysis can be done by anyone with an active mind, a mind that rejects questionable information. The essence of proper inquiry is to always hold context foremost and to never lose sight of the fact that a single erroneous premise will destroy the logic of one’s thinking.