The real Mark Carney.

The federal Liberals will designate Mark Carney as “WEF heir apparent” to complete the takeover of Canada: to become a post-sovereign nation ruled by globalist elites like him.

I asked Claude.ai

“Was it true that Mark Carney admitted that he is an elite and a globalist, then stated that this is exactly what Canada needs? Is Carney right?”

Claude replied.

Mark Carney, former Governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, did make comments along these lines during an interview with Michael Enright, though the full context is important to understand his point.

To address whether he's "right" requires examining both what he actually said and the broader debate about elites and globalism in governance:

What Carney Actually Said:

In the interview, Carney acknowledged being part of the elite and having a global perspective from his international career. He argued that his experience working across borders gave him valuable insights for addressing complex global challenges like climate change and financial regulation.

The Broader Debate:

This is a highly polarized political question with legitimate perspectives on both sides:

Those who might agree with Carney argue that:

- Complex global problems (climate change, pandemics, financial crises) require coordinated international responses

- Having leaders with international experience and expertise can be valuable for navigating global systems

- Technical expertise is necessary for managing complex economic and financial systems

Those who might disagree with Carney argue that:

- Self-identified "elites" may be disconnected from everyday citizens' concerns

- Globalism can prioritize international interests over national ones

- Democratic accountability is essential, and technocratic governance can lack this

- National sovereignty should be preserved

In Canada specifically, this debate reflects tensions between:

- The benefits Canada has gained from international trade and cooperation

- Concerns about national autonomy and democratic control

This is fundamentally a political and philosophical question about governance, with reasonable people holding different views based on their values and priorities. Whether Carney is "right" depends entirely on one's political perspective, values regarding nationalism versus globalism, and views on technocratic versus democratic governance.

My perspective.

Throughout my 73-year lifetime, I have watched governments get bigger, more expensive, and take on increasing authority over every life and business entity that falls under their ever-expanding control.

The One World Order that elite representatives of the UN and WEF have been pushing is the ultimate level of control, a World Government. All other democratic institutions will be forced to bow to its authorities as it continues its unchecked and well-funded expansion.

Mark Carney is the face of World Government.

If he should become the Canadian Prime Minister, you can realistically think of him as the World Government Ambassador to Canada.

Carney will simply continue the transition of Canada to a “post-national state” that Justin Trudeau, Chrystia Freeland and Jagmeet Singh started as WEF representatives.

Mark speaks at the WEF.

Let that thought sink in.