AGENDA 2026: Sustainable NET-ZERO DEFICITS

If the UN can has 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), why can’t Canada has its own Sustainable Economic Goals (SEGs)? The STRONACH FOUNDATION for ECONOMIC RIGHTS inspires the way.

Unelected Globalists trespass on Canadian soil.

The United Nations has defined 17 Sustainable Economic Goals (SDGs) for planet Earth. Their leaders and allies are using these as an excuse to infiltrate our government policies and spending priority WITHOUT the permission of individual Canadian citizens or even a statistical majority of them.

There are 193 sovereign members states in the UN, each unique in virtually every way.

Each nation governs its own human and economic resources under sovereign rules that have evolved to meet their unique circumstances and governance approaches.

This is the reality of every country in the world. The UN’s 17 SDGs is a “collective” mission which overlooks the reality of each nation and it's elected representatives.

Wikipedia explains.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainable_Development_Goal

The following comes directly from the above Wikipedia post:;

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by all United Nations members in 2015, created 17 world Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). They were created with the aim of "peace and prosperity for people and the planet..."[1][2][3] – while tackling climate change and working to preserve oceans and forests. The SDGs highlight the connections between the environmental, social and economic aspects of sustainable development. Sustainability is at the center of the SDGs.[4][5]

The short titles of the 17 SDGs are: No poverty (SDG 1), Zero hunger (SDG 2), Good health and well-being (SDG 3), Quality education (SDG 4), Gender equality (SDG 5), Clean water and sanitation (SDG 6), Affordable and clean energy (SDG 7), Decent work and economic growth (SDG 8), Industry, innovation and infrastructure (SDG 9), Reduced inequalities (SDG 10), Sustainable cities and communities (SDG 11), Responsible consumption and production (SDG 12), Climate action (SDG 13), Life below water (SDG 14), Life on land (SDG 15), Peace, justice, and strong institutions (SDG 16), and Partnerships for the goals (SDG 17).

These goals are ambitious, and the reports and outcomes to date indicate a challenging path. Most, if not all, of the goals are unlikely to be met by 2030. Rising inequalities, climate change, and biodiversity loss are topics of concerns threatening progress.

The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 to 2023 made these challenges worse. The pandemic impacted all 17 goals and emphasized the interconnectedness of global health, economic, social, and environmental challenges.[6] Some regions, such as Asia, have experienced significant setbacks during that time. The global effort for the SDGs calls for prioritizing environmental sustainability, understanding the indivisible nature of the goals, and seeking synergies across sectors.

With regards to the political impact of the SDGs, it has been observed that they have mainly influenced global and national debates. By doing so, they have lead to discursive effects for global and national debates. However, they have struggled to achieve transformative changes in policy and institutional structures.[6]

The uneven prioritization of goals reflects longstanding national development policies. This complicates the global endeavor towards sustainable development. For example, there has long been a tendency to favor socio-economic objectives over environmental ones.[6]

Funding remains a critical issue for achieving the SDGs. Significant financial resources would be required worldwide. The UN, other international organizations, and national governments are trying to assist with funding efforts. Furthermore, the role of private investment and a shift towards sustainable financing are also essential for realizing the SDGs. Examples of progress from some countries demonstrate that achieving sustainable development through concerted global action is possible.

Frank Stronach is for Canadian prosperity.

The STRONACH FOUNDATION for ECONOMIC RIGHTS, A Coalition of Concerned Citizens proposes a 7-Point set of economic policy recommendations for Canada based on common sense principles. These may be “common sense” to most Canadians, but do they also meet that standard by the authors of the UN’s 17 SDGs?

While an unelected group of people associated with the United Nations continues to trespass on Canada’s economic and legislative turf, Mr. Stronach sees the threat, describes the risks and identifies the consequences to every Canadian.

For Frank to realize his vision…

Steps and resources must be identified, plans established and initiatives executed according to these common-sense questions:

• WHAT has to be done?

• WHY?

• BY WHOM?

• HOW and

• WHEN?

Referring for each of Frank’s 7 Points, let’s look at them one Point at a time beginning with:

1) Balance The Budget & Eliminate the National Debt [the WHAT]

[the WHY] “Every family, farmer and small business owner knows that you can’t spend more money than you bring in or you will eventually go bankrupt. The same principle should apply to governments, which should not be allowed to accumulate debt and burden future generations.” [WHAT and WHY].

[WHAT] We should balance the federal budget and begin to pay down our national debt by 5% per year so that [WHY] in 20 years Canada will be debt-free.

Notice that the HOW, WHEN and BY WHOM are missing.

The BY WHOM can only be federal Legislators (elected MPs). This authority is granted to them by achieving an electoral majority according to the “first past the post” election rules and the voting choices made by their constituents.

The HOW is by a majority vote in Parliament pertaining to a Bill that specifies the desired changes (i.e. to enact, amend, repeal or reject the documented proposal).

The WHEN is determined by the priorities of the reigning government majority, the time it takes to prepare the Bill/proposal and the Parliamentary schedule at which the Bill is to be presented to all MPs for consideration and for a vote to answer HOW.

I plan to address Points #2 through #7 in subsequent posts.

Advice for Freedom Groups.

Politics is a domain that has become so “dirty” that no “self-righteous” freedom group member or community desires to potentially sully its reputation by association with political persons or entities.

With perhaps 500+ freedom groups in Canada boasting an unknown number of followers, the potential to affect the HOW, BY WHOM  and WHEN is great. Organized labour has shown us what works in the political sphere while officially maintaining a “non-partisan” status. Two can play at that game, but will they?

Are any of those 500+ groups ready to create a single, organized “union” of like-minded citizens to lobby the political class “in solidarity with their brothers and sisters”?

Would they rally under Civic4Reform’s Statement of Principles plus as least one of STRONACH 7 POINTS, such as the following mandate?

AGENDA 2026: Sustainable NET-ZERO DEFICITS