Dr. Leslyn Lewis is asking all the right questions about Canada’s involvement in this initiative. I admire her non-partisan approach to challenging the secrecy concerning Canada's participation in it.
The Agile Nations Charter is definitely is NOT temporary. It is endorsed and promoted by the WEF as part of Schwab's objective of a one-world government. Only the elite in government, industry and academia are invited to his conferences, where they agree on next steps. Trudeau was delighted to be invited. But the hoi-polloi are not even asked if they agree with this Charter.
Any leader, regardless of party affiliation, who raises legitimate questions that concern all Canadians is a politician who has my respect. A democracy that does not have a government that will be consistently transparent and accountable to the people it serves is not a functioning democracy. The Liberal government is more autocracy than democracy in my view, and Leslyn is shining a light on this fact.
My definition of 'evil' is anyone who thinks hey should have a right to tell you what you can and cannot do or say or think. That certainly covers the three main parties, or 4 if you include he Green Party. So would you choose the lesser of 4 evils? Or are you politically homeless, with no one to vote for?
It seems to me that the Agile Nations Charter may be useful because so many governments believe they have a responsibility to protect us from bad corporations and the hazards of free trade. They have passed lots of regulations, not necessarily consistent with some (maybe all) other governments. The simple alternative is for governments to get out of the way and let trade organizations do the job instead. Before making a significant purchase most people will shop around and look for references. Sometimes called "Consumer Regulation". I always look for the Negative reviews before I download an APP.
An example of Consumer Regulation is Maclean's Magazine annual review of Universities. At one time (before COVID) the government of Ontario considered regulating Home Inspectors. My recommendation for a Consumer Regulated option was for Mike Holmes of TV fame to offer to certify Home Inspectors and provide an online list of good (and bad?) home inspectors. Costs could be covered by fees for certification, and maybe ads for building products Holmes recommends. This is a variation on Underwriters Lab, a non-governmental organization created (and funded) by the home insurance industry when they realized electrical products were causing a lot of house fires. They also created 'Boiler Inspectors' and devices that detected potential weaknesses in boilers when boiler explosions were resulting in many expensive claims. UL is my favourite example.
The Agile Nations Charter is definitely is NOT temporary. It is endorsed and promoted by the WEF as part of Schwab's objective of a one-world government. Only the elite in government, industry and academia are invited to his conferences, where they agree on next steps. Trudeau was delighted to be invited. But the hoi-polloi are not even asked if they agree with this Charter.
Anything that comes from the globalists must be treated as suspicious.
Any leader, regardless of party affiliation, who raises legitimate questions that concern all Canadians is a politician who has my respect. A democracy that does not have a government that will be consistently transparent and accountable to the people it serves is not a functioning democracy. The Liberal government is more autocracy than democracy in my view, and Leslyn is shining a light on this fact.
My definition of 'evil' is anyone who thinks hey should have a right to tell you what you can and cannot do or say or think. That certainly covers the three main parties, or 4 if you include he Green Party. So would you choose the lesser of 4 evils? Or are you politically homeless, with no one to vote for?
It seems to me that the Agile Nations Charter may be useful because so many governments believe they have a responsibility to protect us from bad corporations and the hazards of free trade. They have passed lots of regulations, not necessarily consistent with some (maybe all) other governments. The simple alternative is for governments to get out of the way and let trade organizations do the job instead. Before making a significant purchase most people will shop around and look for references. Sometimes called "Consumer Regulation". I always look for the Negative reviews before I download an APP.
An example of Consumer Regulation is Maclean's Magazine annual review of Universities. At one time (before COVID) the government of Ontario considered regulating Home Inspectors. My recommendation for a Consumer Regulated option was for Mike Holmes of TV fame to offer to certify Home Inspectors and provide an online list of good (and bad?) home inspectors. Costs could be covered by fees for certification, and maybe ads for building products Holmes recommends. This is a variation on Underwriters Lab, a non-governmental organization created (and funded) by the home insurance industry when they realized electrical products were causing a lot of house fires. They also created 'Boiler Inspectors' and devices that detected potential weaknesses in boilers when boiler explosions were resulting in many expensive claims. UL is my favourite example.