I will deliver a deputation at a CKL City Council meeting regarding persistent fear-mongering by our public institutions. With only 5 minutes to speak, it will be a condensed version of this post.
Gene, great article. All the best in your deputation to council. Low levels of government are fear mongering and helping control the masses. Letting council know they are being held accountable is a good practice.
I would love the link to hear your presentation Gene as I am outside of Canada, yet still interested to hear how it goes. I still hope for our elected representatives to have common sense and not to foment all the climate lies we are being told....I just hope the UN hasn't bought off everyone to encourage their agenda. It would also be great if you could garner support of others to be in attendance when you make your presentation to show support. Great Substack as always! I always enjoy reading what you put in your articles and learning as well. :)
That was an extensive and heavy read for me. While the length may be prohibitive to reaching a broad audience, the content is important.
I am giving an equally extensive comment.
I have some constructive suggestions regarding editing (grammatical and content). Please contact me if you would like my input on your deputation.
I find your points relevant with good scientific basis. As an uneducated farmer, I may be able give you the basic precept on how the theory of excess CO2 relates to forest fires.
Elevated global temperatures (the purported basis of alarm) are the single thing “climate deniers” must prove are NOT happening. Failing that, they must prove the rising temperatures are NOT caused by burning fossil fuels.
Here’s the breakdown of the molecular play by play on forest fires as relating to “global warming”. At least from a lay man’s perspective.
#1- Heat causes water molecules to evaporate.
#2- Loss of moisture in the soil and vegetation create conditions for more fires than would otherwise naturally occur.
There is no #3 . It’s actually very simple - that’s why people are able to easily accept it.
So...here we are again, and I am not even sure who is playing devil’s advocate. But, neither you, nor I want to win this non-argument. I’m simply telling you how people think and what they base the forest fire theory on.
Back to your article and what evidence must be shown to disprove - I think the only relevant statistics would be to look over the past 50 years of numbers and acreage of forest fires by natural causes only to see if that is increasing. But - can we positively identify ones that were only naturally caused? Here it must be said that there is evidence arson has caused much of the recent fire activity and that some fires may have been ones that would normally occur, but have gotten major media attention (fear mongering to promote an agenda?)
Aside from that ...and I have reminded you of this before, an important component to this whole thing is our thermal industries which society has failed to scrutinize. Our smoke stacks seem to be immune to suspicion. They were the subject of much concern 40 & 30 years ago. Are we producing LESS goods now or MORE? And what are the results of THOSE emissions which are a lot more than carbon.
I have an idea that the whole “carbon crap” is a literal smoke screen. The actual polluters and destroyers of our environments - INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION and IRRESPONSIBLE WASTE MANAGEMENT are getting away with murder while fossil fuel and cow farts take the blame.
Ps. Spewing metal and toxic particles in the sky “cloud seeding” chem trails needs also to be addressed and STOPPED immediately. I can not fathom how this has been allowed to happen, other than seeing that this is a systematic and planned assault on our populations.
Genocide, population control, mass murder, whatever you want to label it, here we are. And yes, I can back that up with Canada’s own data science. We are dying at an unprecedented rate. Whatever the root cause (and the methods are many) the results are the same - depopulation. How’s that for fear mongering? Or is it not mongering if it’s true? It’s just pointing out the obvious (to me) and warning.
Hi Angel. A fire must be ignited by something such as a match, bolt of lightning or torch. If you are suggesting that spontaneous combustion causes fires, then scientific proof is needed.
When I was a boy, I used a magnifying glass to focus sun light to start a small fire. Where is the proof that natural magnifying glasses occur randomly in nature?
I am waiting for the day that chem trails get more recognition as the culprit they are. Weather management will soon be front and centre also with relation to HAARP.
Gene has presented a good paper. You have made some good insights. Keep up the good work.
Gene, great article. All the best in your deputation to council. Low levels of government are fear mongering and helping control the masses. Letting council know they are being held accountable is a good practice.
Thanks Richard.
I would love the link to hear your presentation Gene as I am outside of Canada, yet still interested to hear how it goes. I still hope for our elected representatives to have common sense and not to foment all the climate lies we are being told....I just hope the UN hasn't bought off everyone to encourage their agenda. It would also be great if you could garner support of others to be in attendance when you make your presentation to show support. Great Substack as always! I always enjoy reading what you put in your articles and learning as well. :)
Gene,
That was an extensive and heavy read for me. While the length may be prohibitive to reaching a broad audience, the content is important.
I am giving an equally extensive comment.
I have some constructive suggestions regarding editing (grammatical and content). Please contact me if you would like my input on your deputation.
I find your points relevant with good scientific basis. As an uneducated farmer, I may be able give you the basic precept on how the theory of excess CO2 relates to forest fires.
Elevated global temperatures (the purported basis of alarm) are the single thing “climate deniers” must prove are NOT happening. Failing that, they must prove the rising temperatures are NOT caused by burning fossil fuels.
Here’s the breakdown of the molecular play by play on forest fires as relating to “global warming”. At least from a lay man’s perspective.
#1- Heat causes water molecules to evaporate.
#2- Loss of moisture in the soil and vegetation create conditions for more fires than would otherwise naturally occur.
There is no #3 . It’s actually very simple - that’s why people are able to easily accept it.
So...here we are again, and I am not even sure who is playing devil’s advocate. But, neither you, nor I want to win this non-argument. I’m simply telling you how people think and what they base the forest fire theory on.
Back to your article and what evidence must be shown to disprove - I think the only relevant statistics would be to look over the past 50 years of numbers and acreage of forest fires by natural causes only to see if that is increasing. But - can we positively identify ones that were only naturally caused? Here it must be said that there is evidence arson has caused much of the recent fire activity and that some fires may have been ones that would normally occur, but have gotten major media attention (fear mongering to promote an agenda?)
Aside from that ...and I have reminded you of this before, an important component to this whole thing is our thermal industries which society has failed to scrutinize. Our smoke stacks seem to be immune to suspicion. They were the subject of much concern 40 & 30 years ago. Are we producing LESS goods now or MORE? And what are the results of THOSE emissions which are a lot more than carbon.
I have an idea that the whole “carbon crap” is a literal smoke screen. The actual polluters and destroyers of our environments - INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION and IRRESPONSIBLE WASTE MANAGEMENT are getting away with murder while fossil fuel and cow farts take the blame.
Ps. Spewing metal and toxic particles in the sky “cloud seeding” chem trails needs also to be addressed and STOPPED immediately. I can not fathom how this has been allowed to happen, other than seeing that this is a systematic and planned assault on our populations.
Genocide, population control, mass murder, whatever you want to label it, here we are. And yes, I can back that up with Canada’s own data science. We are dying at an unprecedented rate. Whatever the root cause (and the methods are many) the results are the same - depopulation. How’s that for fear mongering? Or is it not mongering if it’s true? It’s just pointing out the obvious (to me) and warning.
Many great points!!! Thank you....I learn so much from Substack articles such as these.
Hi Angel. A fire must be ignited by something such as a match, bolt of lightning or torch. If you are suggesting that spontaneous combustion causes fires, then scientific proof is needed.
When I was a boy, I used a magnifying glass to focus sun light to start a small fire. Where is the proof that natural magnifying glasses occur randomly in nature?
Angel, a good response.
With regards to the PS.
I am waiting for the day that chem trails get more recognition as the culprit they are. Weather management will soon be front and centre also with relation to HAARP.
Gene has presented a good paper. You have made some good insights. Keep up the good work.
Here is a link with more info on the climate hoax from another informative Substack to reinforce your point....maybe some info here to further help.
https://www.ourgreaterdestiny.ca/p/meteorologists-scientists-explain?publication_id=832740&post_id=137068914&isFreemail=true&r=p8wht