I like suggesting the focus on approaches that can lead to future success rather than on past failures. the solutions could be discovered together and be more productive than bashing people/parties' past mistakes. If this could be moderated strictly and the participants were disciplined as well, it could result in a really constructive and positive experience.
It could also be a great demonstration of how as a leader, you handle difficult and conflicting perspectives and how you can consider information that may be contrary to your current understanding. An elector should get the opportunity to really contemplate their potential representative in order to cast an informed vote.
In full disclosure, shouldn't you confess to being one of the seven candidates?
You claim it is to be a discussion, not a debate. But the format is just like an all candidates meeting except for the fact it is on a single topic. And I suspect each candidate will want to explain how their party will fix the problem.
I like suggesting the focus on approaches that can lead to future success rather than on past failures. the solutions could be discovered together and be more productive than bashing people/parties' past mistakes. If this could be moderated strictly and the participants were disciplined as well, it could result in a really constructive and positive experience.
It could also be a great demonstration of how as a leader, you handle difficult and conflicting perspectives and how you can consider information that may be contrary to your current understanding. An elector should get the opportunity to really contemplate their potential representative in order to cast an informed vote.
In full disclosure, shouldn't you confess to being one of the seven candidates?
You claim it is to be a discussion, not a debate. But the format is just like an all candidates meeting except for the fact it is on a single topic. And I suspect each candidate will want to explain how their party will fix the problem.